About the practice
AIThis description was summarised by AI from the linked website. It was not written or checked by the practice.Automatically summarisedSource: bewegungsoase.atAs of Sept 2026
Services
Google Reviews
4.4(69)AI Summary
Feedback for Praxisgemeinschaft Bewegungsoase is predominantly positive, with particular praise for professional competence and the attention given to individual needs. The therapists are described as friendly, personable, committed, and motivating, and their clear explanations of exercises are appreciated. The reviews do not provide specific information about waiting times.
Generated automatically from the 5 latest reviews
Doctors12
Physiotherapy4
Mag. Helga Kießling
Physiotherapy
Services
Mag. Friederike Kreutzer-Rath, MSc
Physiotherapie, Osteopathie, Podotherapie
Services
Georg Pflügl
Physiotherapy
Services
Evelyne Tratter
Physiotherapie, Neurophysiologische Bewegungstherapie
Services
Osteopathy2
Katja Friedmann
Osteopathy
Services
Elmari Hoffmann-du Preez
Osteopathy
Services
Occupational Therapy1
Edith Handl
Occupational Therapy
Services
Therapeutic Massage1
Jacob Mauracher
Therapeutic Massage
Services
Life and Social Counseling1
Sascha Hörstlhofer
Life and Social Counseling
Services
Speech Therapy1
Angela Schlager
Speech Therapy
Services
Shiatsu1
Jan Brousek
Shiatsu-Therapie
Services
Sports Science and Exercise Therapy1
Andrea Höller
Trainingstherapie, Osteopathie
Services
Where does the information in this profile come from?
Schnelltermin compiled this profile from publicly available professional information. Practices do not have to register with Schnelltermin for it to exist.
Last updated: 30/09/2026, 09:23
Sources used
- bewegungsoase.atThe clinic website · last checked on 15/07/2026
We do not store profile photos: your browser loads the image directly from the source. If it is deleted or replaced there, it is no longer shown on Schnelltermin either. The exception is an image uploaded in the Arzt-Portal, which we do store.
Schnelltermin processes publicly available professional information so that patients can search for and compare suitable doctors. We base this processing on legitimate interests under Art. 6(1)(f) GDPR.
The Austrian Supreme Court has also considered doctor platforms and the processing of publicly available professional data about doctors, recognising that the information interests of patients and the public can constitute a legitimate interest within the required balancing of interests.